Your game.
Prioritized.
A complete review of one database: what deserves study time, what does not, and what the sample cannot yet answer.
REQUEST EARLY ACCESS · ALPHA IN PREPARATION
Three issues deserve
your attention.
We found several unusual patterns. Only three currently have enough evidence and expected impact to deserve study time.
River Bluff Catching
You continue too often against large river bets in a recurring group of spots.
River Bluff
Catching
A repeating tendency to continue too wide against large river bets after passive turn lines.
Your overall river calling frequency is not obviously abnormal. The problem appears inside a narrower set of decisions.
Against large river bets after passive turn lines, your calls contain too many weak bluff-catchers.
What the frequency hides
186 CALLS AGAINST LARGE RIVER BETS
ILLUSTRATIVE DEMO DATA — NOT SOLVER OUTPUT
TARGET · WEAK BLUFF-CATCHERS 19%
The gap sits almost entirely in one category. Twenty-five points of weak bluff-catchers is the finding.
HAND #14219
PATTERN MATCHBB vs BTN · SINGLE-RAISED POT · 100BB EFFECTIVE
Similar weak bluff-catchers are being continued too frequently in this branch.
HAND #52104
PATTERN MATCHCO vs BB · 3-BET POT · 96BB EFFECTIVE
Ace-high with no improvement after a passive turn — the same branch, a different runout.
Why this
comes first
We do not rank leaks by how strange the stat looks. This pattern happens often enough, appears costly enough, and has enough evidence to justify focused study now.
opportunities in the sample
bb/100 across the database
pattern holds across filters
What to work on
- 1
Review large river bets after passive turn lines.
- 2
Practice fold/call decisions with marginal bluff-catchers.
- 3
Re-measure this exact decision family after new hands are played.
Not every deviation
deserves your time.
Sometimes the correct conclusion is: we don't know yet.
UTG Open Frequency
Slight deviation from a common reference range. The difference is too small relative to your higher-priority problems.
NO ACTION
Turn Probes in Position
There are not enough relevant decisions to make a reliable leak claim.
INSUFFICIENT
EVIDENCE
Finding the leak is
only half the job.
- FOUND
- TRAINED
- PLAYED
- RE-MEASURED
- IMPROVING
targeted overcall frequency
same filter, new hands only
The targeted decisions are moving in the right direction, but there is not enough new evidence yet to mark the leak resolved.
Want this review for
your own database?
Use the hands you've already collected to find what deserves your study time next.
REQUEST EARLY ACCESS · ALPHA IN PREPARATION
Post-session analysis only. No real-time assistance.