Get a Professional Review of
Your PokerTracker Database
If you already have a PT4 database, the next step is not another report tab. It is a review that names a small number of priorities.
PokerTracker stays the tracker. The review is the coaching layer.
REQUEST EARLY ACCESS · ALPHA IN PREPARATION
REQUEST EARLY ACCESS · ALPHA IN PREPARATION
POST-SESSION ONLY · NO REAL-TIME ASSISTANCE
What we analyze in your PT4 database
A PokerTracker review starts from the history you already collect. Aggregate stats help locate candidate areas. Hand histories are what a claim can be verified against.
- HAND HISTORYThe decisions you already played.
- POSITIONSWhere those decisions happened.
- STREETSPreflop through river, when the street is in the data.
- POT TYPESThe pot shape around the decision.
- DECISION FAMILIESRepeating spots, not one interesting hand.
- OPPORTUNITIESHow often that spot actually occurred.
- AGGREGATE STATS FOR TRIAGEFrequencies that show where to look.
Tracker metrics help locate candidate areas. Hand histories provide decision-level evidence.
How much hand history is useful
More hands help. A larger PokerTracker database makes it easier to find repeating spots. Total database hands are still not the same as opportunities in one decision family.
DATABASE
84,281
HANDS
FINDING A
River Bluff Catching
412
OPPORTUNITIES
HIGH CONFIDENCE
FINDING B
Turn probes in position
37
OPPORTUNITIES
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
Confidence is assigned to the finding, not to the whole database. A large sample can still leave a specific spot under-evidenced.
Opportunity count supports confidence in this illustrative review. It does not mechanically mean HIGH in every context.
Stats we use for triage
Common tracker frequencies are useful because they show where to look. They do not prove a leak, and they are not the review output.
- VPIP
- PFR
- 3BET
- FOLD TO 3BET
- CBET
- WTSD
- W$SD
- WWSF
- WINRATE
Why we inspect the hands underneath them
A frequency is a triage signal. The review inspects the filtered hand set and representative decisions before a pattern can be evidenced — or refused.
- STAT SIGNAL
- FILTERED HAND SET
- REPRESENTATIVE DECISIONS
- EVIDENCE
Stats help tell us where to look. They do not prove the leak.
What your review contains
The review is designed to return a short package, not another long stats list. Early access uses the same objects a live review will use.
- 013–5 prioritized decision leaks
A small number of study targets — not a giant warning list.
- 02Evidence and confidence for every finding
Opportunity counts, relevant decisions, and confidence for each finding.
- 03Representative hands
Compact examples of the repeating spot, not one explanation per hand.
- 04What not to work on
NO ACTION is a first-class result when a deviation is not worth this cycle.
- 05A focused training plan
The next practice block for the priority — post-session, not live advice.
- 06Re-measurement after new hands
The same filter, checked again after new hands. Not a short-term winrate claim.
How priority is determined
Priority considers recurrence and opportunity count, estimated impact, confidence, and whether the pattern is trainable. It is not a single tracker sort.
- Recurrence / opportunity count
- Estimated impact
- Confidence
- Trainability / actionability
PRIORITY #1
River Bluff Catching
−0.47 bb/100
RELEVANT DECISIONS
186
of 412 opportunities
HIGH CONFIDENCE
PRIORITY #2
BB vs BTN Defence
−0.31 bb/100
RELEVANT DECISIONS
940
of 2,104 opportunities
HIGH CONFIDENCE
More frequent is not automatically higher priority. A smaller, costlier, well-evidenced family can outrank a larger one.
Sample PokerTracker review
This is an illustrative PokerTracker 4 review, not customer data and not a live result from this page.
- HANDS84,281PT4
- CANDIDATES12
- EVIDENCED6
- PRIORITIES3
- #1HIGH
River Bluff Catching
−0.47 bb/100 · 186 relevant decisions · 412 opportunities
- #2HIGH
BB vs BTN Defence
−0.31 bb/100 · 940 relevant decisions · 2,104 opportunities
- #3MEDIUM
3-Bet Pots OOP
−0.22 bb/100 · 268 relevant decisions · 615 opportunities
Three possible review outcomes
A useful review can name a priority, refuse action, or say the sample is too thin. Those are all valid results.
River Bluff Catching
WORK ON THIS
UTG open frequency
NO ACTION
Turn probes in position
37 opportunities
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
Representative decisions
The review shows compact examples of the repeating spot. It does not invent a full replay or a solver line for every hand.
hh-river-01
BB · Single-raised pot
Called a large river bet after missing
preflop / flop / turn / river
Similar weak bluff-catchers are being continued too frequently in this branch.
hh-river-02
CO · 3-bet pot
Called river after a missed draw
preflop / flop / turn / river
Ace-high with no improvement after a passive turn — the same branch, a different runout.
What happens after the first review
After you train the priority, play new hands, then re-measure the same pattern. The metric is the targeted decision-pattern frequency — not a claim that winrate moved because of the review.
- PRIORITY
- TRAIN
- PLAY NEW HANDS
- RE-MEASURE SAME PATTERN
targeted overcall frequency
TARGETED PATTERN
The status can be IMPROVING without being RESOLVED. Not enough new evidence to mark the leak resolved.
Start with the PT4 database you already have
Export from PokerTracker 4, then open Analyze. You do not need to move or replace the database.
- 01OPEN PT4
Open PokerTracker 4.
- 02SELECT
Select the player and database you want reviewed.
- 03EXPORT
Export the relevant hand-history or report data.
- 04SAVE
Save the export locally.
- 05ANALYZE
Open Analyze and select the file.
The current Analyze preview only checks whether the selected file type looks supported. It does not parse or analyze the file yet. The selected file stays on this device during the current preview.
Full database analysis is not live yet. We're opening early access to players with real PT4, HM3 and hand-history databases.
Early users may be asked to share anonymized exports manually while the automated analyzer is being built.
Questions
Do I need to leave PokerTracker?
No. Export the database you already have. PokerTracker stays the tracker. The review is the coaching layer.
How much history is useful?
More hands help, but total hands are not the same as opportunities in a specific spot. Confidence is assigned per finding, not as one number for the whole database.
See what PPC adds to PokerTracker
The broader overview: keep the tracker, add a performance layer, and decide what deserves attention.
POKERTRACKER LEAK ANALYSISSee how PT4 stats become candidate leaks
The leak-specific page: statistical leak versus decision leak, composition, and verification.
SAMPLE REPORTSee the full proof object
Priorities, refusal states, representative decisions, and the follow-up receipt.
PRICINGSee the intended review structure
Prices are not finalized. This is the structural path — not a live checkout for an automated review.
Your tracker has the history.
The review names what deserves study time.
Export the PokerTracker database you already built. The review is designed to return a short, evidenced priority list.
Post-session analysis only. No real-time assistance.