Find the leaks
actually worth fixing.
Turn your PokerTracker, Holdem Manager, or hand-history database into a short list of decision patterns worth your study time.
REQUEST EARLY ACCESS · ALPHA IN PREPARATION
REQUEST EARLY ACCESS · ALPHA IN PREPARATION
Post-session analysis only. No real-time assistance.
POKERTRACKER 4 · HOLDEM MANAGER 3 · RAW HHPOKERTRACKER 4 · HOLDEM MANAGER 3 · RAW HAND HISTORIES
A database review turns thousands of hands into a study plan.
A good database review does not simply tell you whether your VPIP, PFR, 3-bet, or winrate look normal.
It looks for recurring decision patterns, checks whether there is enough evidence, estimates what matters most, and gives you a small number of priorities.
- DATABASE84,281hands
- PATTERNS12candidates
- EVIDENCE6reliable enough
- PRIORITIES3worth working on
Your stats can look fine while your decisions are not.
SOUND 62 · MARGINAL 26 · EXPENSIVE 12SOUND 62% · MARGINAL 26% · EXPENSIVE 12%
SOUND 28 · MARGINAL 22 · EXPENSIVE 50SOUND 28% · MARGINAL 22% · EXPENSIVE 50%
A useful review answers four questions.
- 01What keeps happening?Find repeated decision patterns across thousands of hands.
- 02Is it actually a problem?Separate statistical noise from patterns with enough evidence.
- 03How much does it matter?Estimate frequency, expected impact, and confidence.
- 04What should I work on first?Prioritize only the issues that deserve study time.
What a finding looks like
River Bluff Catching
Your overall river calling frequency is not obviously abnormal. The problem appears inside a narrower family of calls against large river bets.
HAND #14219
PATTERN MATCHBB vs BTN · SRP · 100BB EFFECTIVE
A strange number is not automatically a leak.
Sometimes the right conclusion is not "fix this." It is "we don't know yet."
River Bluff Catching
WORK ON THIS
UTG Open Frequency
NO ACTION
Turn Probes IP
37 opportunities
INSUFFICIENT
EVIDENCE
The goal is the same as a strong coaching database review.
MANUAL DATABASE REVIEW
A strong coach may:
- Filter the database
- Inspect key stats
- Review recurring spots
- Find representative hands
- Decide what matters most
- Suggest study priorities
POKER PERFORMANCE COACH
The product structures the same workflow:
SCALABLEREPEATABLEEVIDENCE-DRIVEN
Human coaching remains valuable. The product makes database diagnosis repeatable between coaching sessions.
You probably have more than one leak.
The problem is not finding something imperfect.
The problem is deciding what deserves your time first.
- #1River Bluff Catching
- #2BB vs BTN Defence
- #33-Bet Pots OOP
The review is the beginning, not the end.
After working on a priority, the same decision family is measured again on new hands.
The goal is not to claim that a short-term winrate swing proves improvement. The goal is to verify whether the targeted decisions changed.
- FIND
- TRAIN
- PLAY
- RE-MEASURE
What your database review is designed to include
- 013–5 prioritized decision leaks
- 02Evidence for each finding
- 03Confidence level
- 04Estimated impact
- 05Relevant decision count
- 06Representative hands
- 07What not to work on
- 08Focused training priorities
- 09Follow-up re-measurement
Keep the tracker you already use.
Keep PT4 as your database and tracker. Use the review as the performance layer.
PokerTracker analysis →Keep HM3 and Leak Explorer. Add decision-level evidence and prioritization.
Holdem Manager analysis →Use hand-history exports directly where supported.
Analyze hand histories →- Stats help identify where to look.
- Findings require enough relevant decisions.
- Confidence stays visible.
- "Insufficient evidence" is a valid outcome.
Common questions
Is this just another AI poker app?
No. The product is structured around database evidence, recurring decision patterns, confidence, and prioritization. AI may explain findings, but it does not invent hands, sample sizes, or solver outputs.
Do I need to stop using PokerTracker or Holdem Manager?
No. Keep the tracker you already use. PokerTracker 4 and Holdem Manager 3 remain the database. This product is the review and prioritization layer.
How many hands do I need?
It depends on the decision family. A large database can still leave some spots under-evidenced. Insufficient evidence is a valid result, not a failed review.
Can a normal-looking stat still hide a leak?
Yes. Aggregate statistics tell you how often something happened. Two players can share the same fold-to-3bet and arrive there through very different decisions.
Is this real-time assistance?
No. This is post-session analysis only. There is no live HUD, no current-hand advice, and no real-time assistance.
Your database already
contains the clues.
Turn the hands you've already played into a clear list of what deserves your study time next.
Post-session analysis only. No real-time assistance.